Comments on: Is Ziip Beauty Nano Current Device Worth The $500 Price Tag?

By: Gio

Gio — Fri, 12 Jun 2020 07:53:34 +0000

In reply to ZZ. ZZ, I hear ya and I share a lot of my concerns. That's why I use and recommend to my clients old and trusted ingredients like retinol and glycolic acid over these new products and treatments.

By: ZZ

ZZ — Wed, 27 May 2020 14:11:33 +0000

Hi. Thank you for your review. I saw above the question about cancer cells. What bothers me about these new trearment technologies that there are NO studies proving no side effects long term. ZIIP for instance “wakes up”/triggers your face skin to regenerate faster….what if your face “gets used to it”. What if you stop using the device? Would your face skin “forget” how to heal on its own? Would it always need “help” in the future?
I had the same question for the laser light therapy…
I am sure a lot of celebrities use MANY other anti aging skin care products/services than just ZIIP

By: Dawn Miranda

Dawn Miranda — Wed, 08 Jan 2020 13:06:03 +0000

I am extremely late to the game, but wanted to say – I have suffered from extremely bad rosacea my entire adult life…. extremely, heartbreakingly bad. I don’t even look at my face in the mirror, and avoid my reflection at all costs. I have taken antibiotics, Finacea, Tretinoin, Rhofade. The list is literally all inclusive. I read some research on the healing power of nanocurrents on my condition, and thought what the hell… after 3 treatments, 3 days of the clearing treatment, my skin is significantly better, less red, no swelling, and it doesn’t hurt. My skin doesn’t hurt anymore. I have continued, and will continue to use it.
So, my experience with the device is extremely positive- I genuinely recommend it to fellow problem skin sisters and brothers.

By: Feba

Feba — Wed, 30 Oct 2019 22:35:34 +0000

i looked at the patent application for ziip, US 9861818, and it only states that it is a current less than 1 microamp. specifically, ” the electric current is one of a microcurrent, a nanocurrent, or a picocurrent”. It doesnt state that there is any significant changes when it comes to using a micro current, nanocurrent or picocurrent. It looks like a marketing stunt. also, i graduated with a electrical engineering degree and i should mention that frequency is different than current range. for example, a current of 1 microamp any frequency from 1Hz to 100Hz or greater.

By: Jessica R Pelon

Jessica R Pelon — Tue, 15 Oct 2019 16:58:31 +0000

In reply to Gio. I know from personal experience that physical therapist wouldn’t use ultrasound or anything that speeds up cell turnover on anyone who has ever had cancer.

By: Gio

Gio — Sat, 14 Sep 2019 11:30:44 +0000

In reply to Beth. Beth, I personally am not a fan of any of these gadgets, Nuface Trinity included. Nothing you can buy OTC is a s powerful as what you get at your doctor's office.